Design Temp + Perm workflows without reporting chaos
The reference architecture for mixed-model agencies — shared where it saves time, separate where it protects clarity.
Two engines, one database
One pipeline for two businesses breaks both
Temp and perm are different revenue engines — the architecture should respect that.
See what you'll actually get
A parallel map, a shared-vs-separate matrix, and one KPI layer that spans both.
Temp vs perm, side by side
The decision matrix
One reporting currency
What you'll get
The blueprint mixed-model agencies wish they had before they scaled.
Parallel pipeline reference map
Side-by-side temp vs perm stage flows with divergence points marked.
Shared vs separate guidance
A decision matrix for pipelines, candidate pools, job templates, and commission logic.
Reporting alignment model
A unified KPI layer (fill rate, time-to-fill, GM per placement/hour) that works across both models.
Get the Architecture Map
Built from mixed-model implementations where reporting chaos was the #1 leadership complaint.
- ✓Printable A3/tabloid map
- ✓Shared-vs-separate decision matrix
- ✓Unified KPI alignment table
- ✓Editable Slides version included
“Share data objects, separate process flows. That is the whole trick.”
Get the Architecture Map
Free. Printable PDF + editable Slides.
Questions, answered
Yes, it’s ideal for expansion planning.
Yes, as a hybrid path on the map.
No — it’s the process architecture your platform should implement.
Build workflows that scale both engines
Skip a year of trial-and-error redesign with a reference architecture that already works.